newspaper templates - theme rewards

.

Wacky Physics: Are Entangled Particles Connected by Wormholes?

April 3, 2014 Quantum Mechanics 9662
Share!
A simulation of entangled particles (Credit: John Jost and Jason Amini - via Livescience)

A simulation of entangled particles (Credit: John Jost and Jason Amini – via Livescience)

Quantum entanglement (also known as “spooky action at a distance”) is one of the most bizarre things we see happening with particle interactions on a microscale. Instead of acting as one solitary particle, certain pairs act as one – always knowing what the other is doing (and changing based on the characteristics of its partner) – despite being located vast distances apart. Obviously, this is problematic. Relativity says that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light. Yet, that’s exactly what entangled particles are doing – passing along information at speeds far exceeding light-speed travel – the universal speed limit. We shouldn’t rush to make adjustments to general relativity though, as one hypothesis has been put forth that combines quantum entanglement with a darling (yet highly theoretical) concept – Einstein-Rosen bridges (commonly known as wormholes).

According to a paper, published by Juan Maldacena and Leonard Susskind: entangled particles may be connected to one another by infinitesimally small wormholes – tunnel-like portals that connect two distant regions of space. This is how they are able to exchange signals almost instantaneously – even when they are located on opposite ends of the universe. The whole thing centers on a concept called an eternal black hole – another highly theoretical concept that postulates an entirely different universe can be found on the “other side” of a black hole (to get to it, one must delve into the black hole’s event horizon – the point of no return – before traveling into the singularity. Assuming you survive the spaghettification process – you would hypothetically pop back out into a different universe than the one you originated from). In layman terms, this indicates black holes are actually bridges that connect separate universes. (Or to put it another way, one single black hole exists in two universes)

Credit: Getty Images

Credit: Getty Images

Assuming you are still following me: in this scenario – with entangled black holes – any change to one of them would automatically effect the other as well. Hence the correlation between the two phenomena. As stated: these ideas, which are not new, are highly theoretical (perhaps even a little bit speculative). They will remain as such until we find definitive evidence of the existence of the so-called wormholes, but they are a mathematical prediction of general relativity. Therefore, one should expect this evidence to manifest eventually. In any case – the entanglement/wormhole hypothesis offers an explanation for noted instances of entangled particles becoming spontaneously disentangled – the wormholes connecting them collapse.

It also provides insight into several other perplexing concepts, dealing with a disconnect between general relativity and quantum mechanics. One deals with black holes and virtual particles.

Click to see a larger image (Source)

Click to see a larger image (Source)

Typically, they cancel one another out (and annihilate one another), but on some occasions, a black hole will consume one member of a pair of virtual particles – causing the other to physically manifest – before it drifts off into the abyss of space. We call this hawking radiation. In order for information about the objects the black hole consumed to remain intact – we believe that these particles must all be entangled with one another – meaning that the state of each individual particles depend of the state of similarly entangled particles of hawking radiation.

This presents us with a sticky paradox, called the black hole firewall paradox. It clearly indicates that each particle is entangled with not one, but multiple other particles at the same time – something the laws of physics frown upon. So, to avoid this – physicists developed a concept that says that after a particle crosses the event horizon – into the singularity – the quantum bond breaks. Subsequently producing a huge burst of energy that acts like a wall of fire.

Credit: Newscientist

Credit: Newscientist

This is where the wormhole/entanglement idea comes in to play. According to Susskind and Maldacena (who built on a paper published a few years prior to theirs) the wormholes connecting the particles from the interior and exterior of the event horizon act as a buffer to smooth out the entanglement issues – avoiding the need for a firewall. Going a bit further with that, we can say that even when a virtual particle “pops” into existence – before going on its merry way – it is still intimately connected not only to the interior of the black hole it came from, but it also has a palatable connection to its fellow brethren. They quite literally become interconnected by a slew of tiny, spaghetti-like strings. They may even remain as such after leaking hawking radiation causes the black hole to dry up, before evaporating – after the bulk of its mass is lost to space.

Of course – these quantum constructs are much to small for humans to traverse. That, paired with questions about their overall stability – mean that there is no need to get excited about the possibility of teleportation. Or anything else, for that matter. However, this could have a profound effect on how we view the overall structure of spacetime. One physicist – working separate from Susskind and Maldacena – even suggested that spacetime is a manifestation of quantum entanglement. All interesting ideas, indeed.

Write a Comment

163 Comments

  1. Sahar Ahmed September 14, 2013 at 8:32 pm -

    :-)

    Reply
  2. Bob Smith September 14, 2013 at 8:36 pm -

    I love science!!!!

    Reply
  3. Jordan Berryhill September 14, 2013 at 8:37 pm -

    Sliders!

    Reply
  4. Doorknob Sugarfoot September 14, 2013 at 8:38 pm -

    That’s a lot of wormholes

    Reply
  5. Jeremy Francois September 14, 2013 at 8:38 pm -

    That’s cool (Y) Shared!!!

    Reply
  6. Jay Wilson September 14, 2013 at 8:39 pm -

    “For every action there is a reaction”

    Reply
  7. Tyler Madson September 14, 2013 at 8:39 pm -

    Many people, including myself, believe the big bang couldve just been the ass-end of a feeding blackhole that spit out a new universe

    Reply
    • Scott Aric White September 14, 2013 at 8:43 pm -

      And the singularity in other black holes are other universes, just as we exist in a singularity…

      Reply
    • Jay Wilson September 14, 2013 at 8:45 pm -

      Like this super sized 17 billion solar mass blackhole that exists may be churning out stars or other forms of balanced equations else where! I love this concept as it explains and justified that matter cannot be destroyed or wasted, simply recycled but then another side to that argument that in a universe or even multi-verse mass is quite possibly limited.

      Reply
    • Jeremy Want September 14, 2013 at 9:02 pm -

      Don’t you mean a white hole? ;)

      Reply
  8. Sara Eowyn Reid September 14, 2013 at 8:41 pm -

    Explains why I can’t make up my mind, quantum entanglement!

    Reply
  9. Jeremiah Sessa September 14, 2013 at 8:43 pm -

    James Danger Harvey

    Reply
  10. Thomas Gallmeier September 14, 2013 at 8:45 pm -

    i believe such things exist because the universe is inherently BADASS ;)

    Reply
  11. Dan Bell September 14, 2013 at 8:47 pm -

    If every particle was connected to another identical particle by a wormhole, or whatever, does that mean there is another mirrored universe?

    Reply
  12. Leo Shim September 14, 2013 at 8:47 pm -

    I’ve always imagined black holes as portals to other universes ever since I learned about singularity. It makes so much sense.

    Reply
  13. Dan Bell September 14, 2013 at 8:49 pm -

    Really puts the prospect of alternate universes into a new light.

    Reply
  14. Dan Bell September 14, 2013 at 8:49 pm -

    W r W Splaxx

    Reply
  15. Matthew Oscar Meyer September 14, 2013 at 8:50 pm -

    Paul Allen

    Reply
  16. Nader Osama Soliman September 14, 2013 at 8:51 pm -

    Fringe :D :D

    Reply
  17. Gus Carter September 14, 2013 at 8:51 pm -

    Maybe through dark mater or dark energy these particles are linked or communicating with each other.

    Reply
  18. Paul Moss September 14, 2013 at 8:51 pm -

    Interesting theory. Personally I believe that entanglement is caused by the same particle being in two places at once.

    Reply
  19. David McCalmon September 14, 2013 at 8:53 pm -

    Interesting in the extreme :)

    Reply
  20. Garrett Townsend September 14, 2013 at 8:57 pm -

    Hahaha anyone else notice the enterprise moving into it?

    Reply
  21. Brent Scott September 14, 2013 at 8:58 pm -

    I could see this theory being used in a science fiction novel/story/movie. Say humans have found a way to travel vast distances at faster than light travel(whether that be a warp drive or tachyonic mimicking field[just made that up right now] or something else) and humanity is now spread out throughout deep space; how would we communicate at such long distances without the delay caused by the damn radio signal only traveling at the speed of light? A simple conversation could take a lifetime! The answer: a quantum entangled radio!!!

    Don’t steal my idea ;)

    Reply
  22. Jeremy M Holcomb September 14, 2013 at 8:58 pm -

    Is it me, or does it look like the Enterprise is about to enter the foremost wormhole in this pic?

    Reply
  23. Marianna Arvay September 14, 2013 at 8:58 pm -

    OK, I’m going to have to go back and re-read this, slowly and carefully–but even so, this is amazing!

    Reply
  24. Dermot O'Logical Carberry September 14, 2013 at 9:02 pm -

    subspace… hmmm

    Reply
  25. Lucy Mae September 14, 2013 at 9:03 pm -

    faster than the speed of light? Better check those fibre optic cable connections, hee hee. I was so in hopes that the neutrino experiment that rocked the scientific community was legit…. but alas, Prof Dr Antonio Ereditato ended up resigning

    Reply
    • Vincent Petitto September 14, 2013 at 9:54 pm -

      Good one Lucy, even quazars don’ go th speed of light and they are ejected from black holes. Also, how could a black hoel which is a condensed sun with more mass than a thousand of our suns possiby be a hole? The ony thing the man did that was correct is say that matter can be turned into enery and visa versa.

      Reply
    • Lucy Mae September 14, 2013 at 9:55 pm -

      all that reading I’ve been doing is paying off…. not bad for being just a groupie ! I can actually make some geek jokes now

      Reply
    • Roy Herold September 15, 2013 at 4:43 am -

      Question for you . . . two fibre optic cables parallel to each other, with information flowing in opposite directions. What is the speed of the streams of information relative to each other?

      Reply
  26. Michael Carrio September 14, 2013 at 9:06 pm -

    <3

    Reply
  27. Marcus R. Stöger September 14, 2013 at 9:12 pm -

    When we see the universe in infrared it seems to be all is connected <3 (its an unknown a cluster-formation – the image is from chandra observatory) ;)

    Reply
  28. Jose E Boyd September 14, 2013 at 9:19 pm -

    NO WHITE HOLES?! DISLIKE.

    Reply
  29. Mthunzi Maseko September 14, 2013 at 9:20 pm -

    I <3 physics! & That is the "Starship Enterprise" about to go @ warp speed Lol

    Reply
  30. Mark Nezic September 14, 2013 at 9:44 pm -

    No matter how physicists twist and turn it, information *can* be passed from one point to another faster than light. Which means that light speed is no longer the universal speed limit it was thought to be. If there are exceptions, then it isn’t universal.

    Reply
  31. Sherry L Lottig September 14, 2013 at 9:46 pm -

    I freaking love your page <3

    Reply
  32. Adam Barnhart September 14, 2013 at 9:47 pm -

    Quantum entanglement is truly the most interesting thing I know about the Universe.

    Reply
  33. Ricardo Marlow September 14, 2013 at 9:50 pm -

    Entangled particles first must be entangled so technically the info is not literally exchanged. It’s like playing clue. The secret is already known by the other particle that’s all… It’s either the candle stick or the gun depending on probability

    Reply
  34. Mechel Gallaway Daniels September 14, 2013 at 9:54 pm -

    Everything in the universe(s) is connected by space which we now know as dark energy. Everything is one being with individualized aspects. The untangled particles have perfected unity in action.

    Reply
  35. Mechel Gallaway Daniels September 14, 2013 at 9:55 pm -

    Oops entangled (typo)

    Reply
  36. Monster Samba September 14, 2013 at 9:55 pm -

    Siamese twins of the soul

    Reply
  37. Clayton Payton September 14, 2013 at 9:57 pm -

    I feel like this is just a work-around for the current theory.

    Reply
  38. Ben Leza September 14, 2013 at 10:00 pm -

    #Sliders

    Reply
  39. Jerri Lynn Silver September 14, 2013 at 10:03 pm -

    I actually I came up with this theory on my own! I think that the black hole connects two universes that are the exact opposite of each other like a photo where there is a positive and a negative image. So one side of the black hole has the “positive” piece of “film” and the other the negative piece. If our cosmic soace is dark with bright start and galaxies, the other universe must have light cosmic space with dark celestial objects. To carry this one step further, here I am my positive self and on the other side of the hole, my negative self exists. Does this sound really crazy?

    Reply
    • Tom Phoghat Sobieski September 15, 2013 at 8:33 am -

      time to take your meds now. IMO, we are all in the thoughts of a giant, green sleeping cat. When tyhe cat awakes we go poof. My theory is exactly as valid as yours.

      Reply
    • Jerri Lynn Silver September 15, 2013 at 9:22 am -

      All things are possible :) Meow :)

      Reply
    • Jerri Lynn Silver September 15, 2013 at 9:23 am -

      Ancient people thought the earth was flat and we were the center of the universe. We are as ignorant as they were compared to man of the future…

      Reply
    • Ozren Begovic September 15, 2013 at 10:17 am -

      Why would it be the opposite? Why not mirror image or some other symmetry? Why symmetry at all?

      Reply
    • Farhan Rahman September 15, 2013 at 10:37 am -

      You know i thought of the same thing but i have a question what kind of matter makes up dark energy?

      Reply
    • Jerri Lynn Silver September 15, 2013 at 11:20 am -

      Farhan that I don’t know :) Ozren, as I said, I just believe anything is possible. I just let my imagination go and that is what I thought of. Maybe it is a miror image or no symmetry at all. I don’t think we will know in this lifetime. The answers to these monumental questions are clearly ot of the reach of current mankind..I do not claim to be a scientist no less a physicist! I am just an ordinary woman who likes to think :)

      Reply
    • Jerri Lynn Silver September 15, 2013 at 11:33 am -

      I followed the links all the way to quantum gravity where I became TOTALLY confused and I gave up trying to comprehend. My head almost exploded. I challenge someone to explain what quantum gravity is in terms a layman might understand…

      Reply
    • Gary Morrison September 15, 2013 at 12:08 pm -

      In which case, on the other side it would be a white hole?

      Reply
    • Jerri Lynn Silver September 15, 2013 at 12:09 pm -

      Agreed

      Reply
    • Jerri Lynn Silver September 15, 2013 at 12:10 pm -

      But it is merely the wild imaginings of a fairly old woman…lol

      Reply
  40. Kent Frostography September 14, 2013 at 10:07 pm -

    I really enjoy the Holographic Universe hypothesis. Even if it isn’t true, it would make for a great story.

    http://www.rense.com/general69/holoff.htm

    Reply
    • Shubham Dhiman D Man September 15, 2013 at 6:09 am -

      i’m reading talbot’s THE HOLOGRAPHIC UNIVERSE.
      Amazing….though I don’t agree with everything but it should be considered by scientists.

      Reply
    • Jerri Lynn Silver September 15, 2013 at 12:21 pm -

      Kent, thank you for posting this article It is fascinating and illuminating. I bookmarked it because it is too much to digest well in one reading.

      Reply
    • Jerri Lynn Silver September 15, 2013 at 12:21 pm -

      Shubham, is Talbot’s book easy enough reading for a layman?

      Reply
  41. Linda Jane Kopina September 14, 2013 at 10:09 pm -

    Love wormholes! :)

    Reply
  42. Libby Huntly September 14, 2013 at 10:20 pm -

    We will never quite know, but it is fun to explore.

    Reply
  43. Garth Simpson September 14, 2013 at 10:35 pm -

    Warp Six, Mr Sulu.

    Reply
  44. Alwina Frankeneinstein Magalie September 14, 2013 at 11:02 pm -

    Dominik Dienlin ↑↓

    Reply
  45. James Allen McCalister September 14, 2013 at 11:22 pm -

    They have accelerated light particles to go faster than light speed although by a marginal fraction but that is proof enough that light speed is not the fastest

    Reply
  46. Gary Baugh September 14, 2013 at 11:27 pm -

    Theoretically, couldn’t entanglement be engineered as an instantaneous form of communication over vast distances?

    Reply
    • Bo Richards September 15, 2013 at 3:49 pm -

      The problem they are trying to get around with that is there is no actual information transmitted through entanglement

      Reply
    • Gary Baugh September 15, 2013 at 3:55 pm -

      Couldn’t an specific response initiated from a specific stimulus be considered a communication that could be interpreted like a yes/no command or the basis for an on/on communication somewhat akin to binary?

      Reply
  47. Robert Atherton September 14, 2013 at 11:33 pm -

    This is interesting, I just wish that we could find some way to travel at FTL speeds soon. I would love nothing more than to step on an alien world for the first time.

    Reply
  48. Peat Knot Picasso September 14, 2013 at 11:39 pm -

    2013-09-15 Bored with Wormholes?

    1. D=VT or velocity unit by time unit.
    2. V=D/T or distance per unit of time unit.
    3. Therefore: T=D/V or distance unit per velocity unit.

    Basic Kinematics really?

    Note for D to be VT it can also be via transposition of elements to prove no more than D=D in its circularity.

    4. D=D/TxD/V from 2. And 3.
    5. D=D^2/VT but VT=D from 1.
    6. D=D^2/D
    7. D=D

    We already know this what’s the point?

    That gravity acts one dimensionally is not a problem. It sucks all toward its monopole. Even when one is in orbit the centripetal force resultant from satellites change of vector status cancels out gravitas effect by counterbalance. Not too difficult?

    Too much and voyager 1 and 2 can escape the gravity of the Sun and Solar System. Too little and one enacts the return to Earth policy. Hope not on your or my head though.

    How then to explain O interconnections of N possible states? O is the table produced by N elements by simple multiplication of 1x2x3…xN.

    If only 2 elements to a state then 2 and only 2 string states possible. We call it digital. Multiple Switches in parallel period double to n in small letters as possible words or system address state switches. In 3 it is 6 possible strings states per parallel column and in 4 it is 24 possible string states. 120 for 5, etc. till it becomes unmanageable.
    Upping the dimensions or switch states tends toward that end that is all.

    The question asked by the Einstein Rosen Bridge defies the speed limit of light speed in a vacuum which when treated with the special case of unitarity or parity as a constant of value 1 allows for E=M and M=E and Energy is Mass and Mass is Energy. So how does the input transfer to the output over all space time volumes synchronistically? The claim that all things are connected may well prove to be true via the preceding ontological argument. Since so then I can know what you are thinking. How come then I do not know? I can assume that what was said is clear enough for a fool to comprehend but as for the professional academics I predict a vicious battle that puts all in between the debate at loggerheads with each other.

    But then I have not told you yet about M=(N/2+1/2)N yet have I and none of them, let alone, I, eye or aye, sir, know why the 1/2 bag full sir must be added before the multiplication. They can never disprove it for all the set of real positive whole integers. For when the largest number is N then the additive produces M and multiplicative sequences produces O. Such that
    N/O x O/N = 1 is therefore not as trivial as first assumed. The number of numbers 1 and above are equal to the numbers 0 to 1.

    Boring? Wormholes do that to you don’t they?

    <8

    Reply
  49. Kimi Thiffeault September 14, 2013 at 11:47 pm -

    Howard the DUCK LOL LOOK THE MOVIE ,,,,,,le trou noir ses un vortex ,, un chemin d une galaxie a un autre et le rejet,,, c est la matiere qui ne peux voyager,,,,,trou noir ,,, pour moi ses une toilette qui prend tou mais des foie il rest des redu merd….. toilette de l espace

    Reply
  50. Peter Bates September 14, 2013 at 11:47 pm -

    We knew this. Didn’t you watch ‘Sliders”

    Reply
  51. John W. Rickey September 15, 2013 at 12:17 am -

    We are really truly just in the baginning stages of understanding how our Universe works. I would agree that all pairs communicate between each other. If you can picture an ocean of waveforms that operate backwards and forwards within time domains as a conduit operating way above our light speed and frequencies, you could say listen to a subspace harmonic at these frequencies of a supernova explosion going off that might take 100,000 light years for the visual information to arrive. if CMB is parallel lines that never connect indicating large scale rotation most likely we are already seeing the conduit picture in the hot cold areas of the close dipoles as a section of our huge torus. With conduits in place, we really could communicate virtually with any position in our particular subspace both in forward and reverse time. Now, first of all forward time is here now in the matter portion of our paired motion, reverse time is advancing ahead of us around to the antimatter paired motion. So, again we are just a PROTON in a hyperdimensional complex that is also made of pairs of huge hyperdimensional rigid spacial relationships that could be the next scale up from our where a trillion years in our time zone would be a second in theres. This universe is complex, eternal, and we are climbing a very steep grade straight up in our learning curve.

    Reply
    • Bo Richards September 15, 2013 at 3:47 pm -

      Just remember though, there is a difference between ‘eternal’ and ‘forever’

      Reply
  52. Hari Pillai September 15, 2013 at 1:33 am -

    maybe all particles in the universe are connected by tiny strings

    Reply
  53. Nick Bradshaw September 15, 2013 at 2:23 am -

    If the black hole occupies both universes, how would you escape from the black hole on the other side? Is there a antithesis to a black hole?

    Reply
  54. Blue Anchor September 15, 2013 at 3:31 am -

    I’ve ways believed that the speed of thought is faster than the speed of light. Maybe these particles are telepathic in a sense

    Reply
  55. Stephen Michael Mcneill September 15, 2013 at 4:10 am -

    Math says they are there, and the universal language is math.

    Reply
  56. Ingrid Ghisu September 15, 2013 at 4:12 am -

    wäre es möglich, eine Übersetzung auf deutsch anzuzeigen? mein englisch ist nicht gut genug und ich würde gerne alles verstehen!

    Reply
  57. Anthony Compobassi September 15, 2013 at 4:23 am -

    A fantastic way to get down the pub double lively :-)

    Reply
  58. Shaun Sadler September 15, 2013 at 4:29 am -

    I would gladly go if it was ever possible.

    Reply
  59. Lupo Činči September 15, 2013 at 4:46 am -

    i just love the word “spaghettification”

    Reply
  60. Syed Minhaj Uddin September 15, 2013 at 4:54 am -

    Muhammad Arsalan any thing is possible

    Reply
  61. Alyssa Kinsey September 15, 2013 at 6:36 am -

    Jefferson Horne

    Reply
  62. Nicholas Ranger September 15, 2013 at 7:44 am -

    I tend to disbelieve the tiny wormhole theory. Even if there are tiny wormholes, what is the factor connecting the two particles? I think the answer lies outside of our current understand of the universe. We, as humans, always place things in the context of what is currently known to us, we once believed the world was made up of the “four elements” that were observable, we once believed the world was flat, and we believed in the sound barrier, barely 60 years ago. Relativity is a “theory” but it is a proven one. My first thought, is it the same particle existing at two locations at the same time?

    Reply
  63. Dev Chandan September 15, 2013 at 7:48 am -

    May be it is right

    Reply
  64. Neil Faulkner September 15, 2013 at 8:54 am -

    Somebody define ‘wormhole’? Seems to be very fluid to me.

    Reply
  65. Jake Larkin September 15, 2013 at 8:55 am -

    How would the bridges be sustained though? In compliance with GR, in order for wormholes to be created there must be significant enough mass to cause such a curvature in space-time. This isn’t as much of a problem for black holes given that they have very large masses, but how would this work for single pairs of low-mass particles? Particularly worrying is the fact that entanglement works for photons, which are assumed to have no mass. Where do the bridges come from?

    Reply
  66. Shawn Shea September 15, 2013 at 9:38 am -

    Oh come on guys… Maybe you need a refresher course. It’s all ball bearings nowadays!!

    Reply
  67. Brandon Cordon September 15, 2013 at 12:20 pm -

    I just want some cheese crackers

    Reply
  68. Jelani Capoeira September 15, 2013 at 1:53 pm -

    I wish I was smarter

    Reply
  69. Femi Akasha-Records September 15, 2013 at 5:06 pm -

    This is sexy

    Reply
  70. doggydog September 15, 2013 at 5:29 pm -

    “Yet, that’s exactly what entangled particles are doing – passing along information at speeds far exceeding light-speed travel ”

    nope

    Reply
    • Jaime Trosper September 19, 2013 at 2:14 am -

      Do you want to elaborate on that? First, It’s a personal pet peeve of mine when people swoop in, make a definitive statement and refuse to back up their position with an actual argument (a scientific one is preferable, but any will do).

      Second, entangled particles do communicate information with one another about their quantum states at speeds that far exceed lightspeed travel. It’s not traditional information, but its information none-the-less.

      Reply
  71. Ssider September 18, 2013 at 3:37 pm -

    Paired particles could also be 3d manifestations of things that exist in more than three dimensions. In that way the the entangled particles are really just one object that looks like more than one given our 3d+t perspective. They act in sync across both time and space because they are really just one thing.

    Reply
  72. Just curious December 12, 2013 at 8:51 am -

    Futuristic communication devices can use this concept to enable us to communicate with each other instantly even if we are separated by light years.

    Reply
    • Otis January 28, 2014 at 10:49 pm -

      that sounds a ways off in the future … since somehow someone must have to travel there first with said device and then communicate…its not like you could pop a walkie-talkie thru the event horizon.!

      Reply
    • Mauricio March 29, 2014 at 4:25 pm -

      Science fiction has already envisioned such devices:
      http://www.bridgetothestars.net/wiki/index.php?title=Lodestone_Resonator

      Reply
  73. Jeff January 28, 2014 at 4:44 pm -

    Jaime, nice article. Dabbling in all things weird and morbid would likely lead a curious person to wonder about black holes. Do you think that the quantum bonds actually break between particles at the event horizon? I’have imagined the whole paradox as a if a big blender were sucking in information, where even information that is at once spurted out by the cutting blades of gravity is yet again combined and recombined until the point where it is close to impossible to differentiate between what has been taken in. Thoughts?

    Reply
  74. Chrissy Raymond Holman March 29, 2014 at 3:18 am -

    “Spooky action at a distance” :D

    Reply
  75. Jordan Max March 29, 2014 at 3:29 am -

    I find it off were spending all this time trying to find wormholes when we can’t even find a missing plane on our own planet

    Reply
  76. Jordan Max March 29, 2014 at 3:29 am -

    I find it off were spending all this time trying to find wormholes when we can’t even find a missing plane on our own planet

    Reply
  77. Jordan Max March 29, 2014 at 3:29 am -

    I find it off were spending all this time trying to find wormholes when we can’t even find a missing plane on our own planet

    Reply
  78. MajorRager Playah April 3, 2014 at 9:07 am -

    42

    Reply
    • Raymond Todaro April 3, 2014 at 9:38 am -

      I wonder if Douglas Adams chose that number at random, or if he spent a little time learning about numerology… 6 (the number of man) x 7 (the number of God) = 42. Man X God = Life, The Universe and Everything?

      Reply
  79. Mana Badman April 3, 2014 at 9:32 am -

    Paul quite literally you are the universe recognising itself. For every photoreceptor cell in each of your eye contains trillions of atoms. Each one formed in the centre of a star and is utilised within you to witness the same process that created them.

    Reply
    • Paul Galdi April 3, 2014 at 9:46 am -

      But I dont need a worm hole, why does the universe?

      Reply
    • Bryant Baker April 3, 2014 at 10:34 am -

      Because information can not propagate faster then light but it does with entangled particles.

      Reply
  80. Mana Badman April 3, 2014 at 9:32 am -

    Paul quite literally you are the universe recognising itself. For every photoreceptor cell in each of your eye contains trillions of atoms. Each one formed in the centre of a star and is utilised within you to witness the same process that created them.

    Reply
    • Paul Galdi April 3, 2014 at 9:46 am -

      But I dont need a worm hole, why does the universe?

      Reply
  81. Mana Badman April 3, 2014 at 9:32 am -

    Paul quite literally you are the universe recognising itself. For every photoreceptor cell in each of your eye contains trillions of atoms. Each one formed in the centre of a star and is utilised within you to witness the same process that created them.

    Reply
    • Paul Galdi April 3, 2014 at 9:46 am -

      But I dont need a worm hole, why does the universe?

      Reply
  82. Mana Badman April 3, 2014 at 9:32 am -

    Paul quite literally you are the universe recognising itself. For every photoreceptor cell in each of your eye contains trillions of atoms. Each one formed in the centre of a star and is utilised within you to witness the same process that created them.

    Reply
    • Paul Galdi April 3, 2014 at 9:46 am -

      But I dont need a worm hole, why does the universe?

      Reply
  83. Mana Badman April 3, 2014 at 9:32 am -

    Paul quite literally you are the universe recognising itself. For every photoreceptor cell in each of your eye contains trillions of atoms. Each one formed in the centre of a star and is utilised within you to witness the same process that created them.

    Reply
    • Paul Galdi April 3, 2014 at 9:46 am -

      But I dont need a worm hole, why does the universe?

      Reply
  84. Mana Badman April 3, 2014 at 9:32 am -

    Paul quite literally you are the universe recognising itself. For every photoreceptor cell in each of your eye contains trillions of atoms. Each one formed in the centre of a star and is utilised within you to witness the same process that created them.

    Reply
    • Paul Galdi April 3, 2014 at 9:46 am -

      But I dont need a worm hole, why does the universe?

      Reply
  85. Mana Badman April 3, 2014 at 9:32 am -

    Paul quite literally you are the universe recognising itself. For every photoreceptor cell in each of your eye contains trillions of atoms. Each one formed in the centre of a star and is utilised within you to witness the same process that created them.

    Reply
    • Paul Galdi April 3, 2014 at 9:46 am -

      But I dont need a worm hole, why does the universe?

      Reply

Write a Reply or Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

(Spamcheck Enabled)

newspaper templates - theme rewards